COBIT self-assessment guide using COBIT / Subjects: COBIT (Information technology management standard) · Information technology > Evaluation. The COBIT PAM adapts the existing COBIT content into an ISO An alignment of COBIT’s maturity model scale with the international standard Assessor qualifications and experiential requirements .. (COSO Guidance ). ISACA has designed and created COBIT® Self-assessment Guide: Using COBIT ® 5 (the ‘Work’) primarily as an assessor . The Measurement Framework.

Author: Bralkree Tygosida
Country: Portugal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 20 January 2012
Pages: 479
PDF File Size: 4.9 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.61 Mb
ISBN: 710-5-14189-500-4
Downloads: 93137
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudozragore

Are work products appropriately identified, documented and controlled? Are resources and information necessary for performing the process identified, made available, allocated and used?

Knowledge, skills and experience: Traceability shall be maintained between the objective evidence collected and the process attribute ratings assigned.

Data Validation Actions are taken to ensure that the data are accurate and sufficiently cover the assessment scope, including: Registration Forgot your password? Requirements for documentation and control of the work products are defined. The report also covers any key issues raised during the assessment such as observed areas of strength and weakness aseessor findings of high risk. Enterprises will, said the security association, be able to use it to perform non-evidence-based capability assessments to serve as a precursor review to a formal assessment.

BP Achieve the process outcomes.

ISACA’s COBIT® Assessment Programme

For each process assessed, assign a rating to each process attribute. Usint the set of process attribute ratings as the process profile and calculate the capability level rating for each process using the Capability Level Ratings criteria. Note that this is the level where the detailed and specific process requirements from the Process Reference Model are used.

Answer any questions or concerns assrssor they may have. Determine the assessment activities. This figure is reproduced from ISO: Verify the completeness of the data.

Seeking information from firsthand, independent sources Using past assessment results Holding feedback sessions to validate the ghide collected Some data validation may occur as the data is being collected Assemble and consolidate the data.


To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policyincluding cookie policy. Performance of the process is adjusted to meet plans. Assessment outputs desired by the sponsor in addition to those required as part of uusing assessment record are identified and described. We will walk through an example of these shortly.

Outcomes Os Number Description DS1-O1 A service management framework is in place to define the organisational structure gkide service level management, covering the base definitions of services, roles, tasks and responsibilities of internal and external service providers and customers.

ISACA publishes COBIT process assessment model

In this case, the assessor would be trying to determine the extent to which the elements of PA2. Developed Documented together with An assessment schedule Identify the project scope Secure the necessary resources to perform the assessment Determine the method of collating, reviewing, validating and documenting the information required for the assessment Co-ordinate assessment activities with the organisational unit being assessed The Assessment Planning phase includes such things as: As a result of full achievement of this attribute: Custom Statutory Programs Chapter 3.

If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first — these can be used to check. Collect evidence of process performance for each process within the scope. DS1-BP5 Monitor and report end-to-end service level performance.

They represent a common starting point for assessment, which increases the consistency of assessor judgment and enhances the repeatability of the results. Input Process Output Brief the organisational unit on the performance of the assessment: Reporting the Results Overview During this phase, the results of the assessment are analysed and presented in a report.

Youtube play icon

About project SlidePlayer Terms of Service. Collect evidence of process capability for each process within the scope. This attribute is fully achieved when 4. process achieves its defined outcomes. My interpretation would be that: Work products are produced that provide evidence of process outcomes, as outlined in section 3.


Provide the Assessment Record to assessog sponsor for retention and storage. To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors.

Known by the acronym of PAMthe security model is billed as allowing business and IT managers to have confidence in the assessment process and the quality of the guidr as they maximize the business value of their IT investments. Lead into the next slide with differences and say: Identify any additional information that needs to be gathered Select the assessment participants, the assessment team and define the roles of team members Define assessment inputs and outputs: In addition, simplified guidance has been developed in a Self-assessment Guide to completing assessments for those wanting to perform a simple, judgement based self assessment as a precursor to a more formal compliant assessment.

Work products are reviewed in accordance with planned arrangements and adjusted as necessary assesdor meet requirements. Production of an object A significant change of state; Meeting of specified constraints, e.

For each process attribute rated, the relationship between the indicators and the objective evidence shall be recorded. The next attributes relate to management of the process and associated work products: Data Collection Assexsor assessor obtains and documents an understanding of the process es including process purpose, inputs, outputs and work products, sufficient to enable and support the assessment Data required for evaluating the processes within the scope of the assessment are collected in a systematic manner The strategy and techniques for the selection, collection, analysis of data and justification of the ratings are explicitly identified and demonstrable Each process identified in the assessment scope is assessed on the basis of objective evidence:

Posted in Art